Comparison test: Honda CBR 250 R against Kawasaki Ninja 250 R
250cc super athlete for beginners
Content of
Honda’s CBR 250 R and the Kawasaki Ninja 250 R occupy supporting roles and are in the shadow of the stars. But like in Hollywood, characters from the second row are often underestimated. A huge mistake!
Just a few weeks ago, the testers at the PS Bridgestone Tuner GP hunted real rockets over the Hockenheimer slope. In the case of the fastest bikes, well over 200 stallions tugged on feather-light chassis, and the power-to-weight ratio was well over one hp per kilogram. And today? The other extreme! In this comparison test, a small engine from the schnapps glass league with measured 26 hp and a vehicle weight of 166 kilos in the Honda CBR 250 R. It doesn’t look much different with the Kawasaki Ninja 250 R from: 31 hp, 173 kilos.
A tough cut that even experienced testers have to get used to. But then the 250 reveals qualities that beginners or those returning to the sport can look forward to. And even appeal to experienced cable pullers who are looking for a speedster for the city or for easy going: extremely light-footed handling, excellent controllability, low costs.
Honda CBR 250 R..
In this respect, the CBR 250 R shines. With 4490 euros, Honda calls for around half a thousand less for its little sweeper than the Greens for the mini ninja, which rolls out of the dealer for 4995 euros. Even though the CBR brakes with ABS as standard. For the Kawa there is no blocking preventer even for an extra charge. The higher price of the Kawa is mainly due to the design of its engine. In contrast to the Honda, in which a single cylinder works, a prestigious two-cylinder fires the little ninja. This means a greater technical effort and thus higher costs.
But does the twin really have advantages? Yes, on paper, because the Kawa sends five more horsepower to the clutch than the CBR. It’s a small world in this performance class. In practice, however, the ninja benefits only marginally from the extra power.
Kawasaki Ninja 250 R.
The biggest difference is in the top speed. There it stands 158 to 140 km / h (each factory specification) in favor of the Kawasaki. But when sprinting from 0 to 100 km / h, the Honda hums it with 7.5 to 8.0 seconds, just half a second. The small difference results from the performance of the Kawa. You first have to torment your way through the low speeds before the engine starts at around 9,000 rpm and generates maximum output at around 11,000 rpm.
The excellent engine characteristics are mainly the result of the small individual cubic capacities. The CBR is different. Power and torque are available much earlier with the stew. But when the Kawa begins to really bite, the Honda has long since given up. So two very different characters, each of which fascinates in its own way and at most unites their great smoothness and the pleasant bubbling sound. In everyday life, the Honda single has slight advantages with its nature – it simply delivers more bang in the lower rev range.
Despite the wider rear wheel rim and correspondingly larger tires, the CBR is quite handy.
Get out of everyday life and into the wonderful world of curves! It’s amazing how easy the 250s are even through the tightest of meanders. The thought of an incline is enough, and hops, the two sweep the arches. Despite the wider rear wheel rim and correspondingly larger tires, the CBR scurries around the radii a tad more manageable than the Kawa. This is largely due to their slightly lower weight and the more handling-friendly geometry. The neutral driving behavior and the directional stability of the Honda in the corners are also impressive. Although the Kawa is also a real corner wetter, it seems a bit more nervous than the CBR when it comes to bending and sloping.
More power? The Kawasaki Ninja 250 R reaches a top speed of 158 km / h.
When it comes to the brakes, however, the ninja shines. Wonderful to dose, with a crisp pressure point, crystal-clear transparency and excellent effect, the stoppers leave nothing to be desired. The Honda catches, on the other hand, seem a bit blunt and require a comparatively large amount of hand strength. The highlight of the Honda stopper is undoubtedly the combined ABS, which also activates the front caliper when the rear brake is activated. If you don’t anchor in the last groove, all you need to do is step on the brake pedal. When decelerating to the limit, both the CBR and the Ninja have a powerful fork that prevents shorter braking distances.
This is just as unfortunate as it is unnecessary, because adjusting the forks so that they do not block and still work comfortably doesn’t cost a cent! On the other hand, the rear sections of the two 250s spring and dampen more convincingly. Equipped with suitable springs, the monoshocks do not hit through even in poor terrain and respond adequately. So it would actually be a mistake to underestimate bikes from the second row.
PS measurements
The power delivery of engines with the same cubic capacity could hardly be more different. On the one hand the Honda CBR 250 R, which grips a little more powerfully up to 5000 rpm than the Kawasaki Ninja 250 R, and from 5500 rpm even delights with an extra kick. But from 8000 rpm it looks listless and continues to turn very slowly. On the other hand, the Kawa, which only really wakes up from 9500 rpm and runs into the limiter at 13,500 rpm. However, not much is possible with her until shortly before the five-digit range. If you want to keep up with the ninja, you have to turn it mercilessly. In terms of performance, due to the low top speeds, we exceptionally give values of up to 140 km / h instead of the usual 150 km / h.
Modern styled information center with analog tachometer and digital speed display on the Honda CBR.
drive
Single-cylinder engine, four valves / cylinder, 19.4 kW (26 HP) at 8500 rpm *, 23 Nm at 7000 rpm *, 249 cm³, bore / stroke: 76.0 / 55.0 mm, compression ratio: 10.7: 1, ignition / injection system, 38 mm throttle valve, mechanically operated multi-disc oil bath clutch, six-speed gearbox, G-Kat, chain
landing gear
Steel tubular space frame, steering head angle: 65.0 degrees, caster: 95 mm, wheelbase: 1369 mm, conventional fork, Ø fork inner tube: 37 mm, not adjustable. Central spring strut with deflection, adjustable in the spring base. Suspension travel front / rear: 130/104 mm
C-ABS: on board as standard and works perfectly.
Wheels and brakes
Light alloy cast wheels, 2.75 x 17 "/ 4.00 x 17", front tires: 110 / 70-17, rear: 140 / 70-17, first tires: IRC Road Winner RX 01, 296 mm single disc brake with conventionally attached three -piston floating caliper front, 220 mm single disc with single-piston floating caliper at the rear, C-ABS
measurements and weight
Length / width / height: 2050/840/1130 mm *, seat / handlebar height: 780/940 mm, handlebar width: 665 mm, 166 kg fully fueled, v./h .: 47.9 / 52.1%
Rear wheel power in last gear
16 kW (22 PS) at 130 km / h
consumption
Fuel type: Super unleaded. Average test consumption: 3.0 liters / 100 km, tank capacity 13 liters, range: 433 km
Base price
4490 euros (plus additional costs)
The clutch of the Kawasaki Ninja needs a lot of hand strength for a 250cc.
drive
Two-cylinder in-line engine, four valves / cylinder, 24 kW (33 PS) at 11,000 rpm *, 22 Nm at 8200 rpm *, 249 cm³, boron / stroke: 62.0 / 41.2 mm, compression ratio: 11.6: 1, ignition / injection system, 28 mm throttle valve, mechanically operated multi-plate oil bath clutch, six-speed gearbox, G-Kat, chain
landing gear
Steel bridge frame, steering head angle: 64.0 degrees, caster: 82 mm, wheelbase: 1400 mm, conventional fork, Ø fork inner tube: 37 mm, not adjustable. Central spring strut with deflection, adjustable in the spring base. Suspension travel front / rear: 120/130 mm
Clear cockpit with shaft controlled speedometer and mechanical trip meter.
Wheels and brakes
Light alloy cast wheels, 2.75 x 17 "/ 3.50 x 17", front tires: 110 / 70-17, rear: 130 / 70-17, first tires: IRC Road Winner RX 01, 290 mm single disc brake with conventionally attached two -piston floating caliper front, 220 mm single disc with two-piston floating caliper at the rear
measurements and weight
Length / width / height: 2080/810/1100 mm *, seat / handlebar height: 775/940 mm, handlebar width: 650 mm, 173 kg fully fueled, v./h .: 48.0 / 52.0%
Rear wheel power in last gear
19.4 kW (26 PS) at 146 km / h
consumption
Fuel type: Super unleaded. Average test consumption: 4.1 liters / 100 km, tank capacity 17 liters, range: 414 km, base price 4995 euros (plus additional costs)
HP conclusion
Kawa or Honda? Both speedsters definitely cut a fine figure. But in practice the 250cc super sports car from Honda clearly scores.
Honda CBR 250 R engine, Chassis, price: The small Honda delivers a very coherent overall package and wins the comparison of the lively sweeps. Your ABS provides newcomers and those returning to the market with a purchase argument that should not be underestimated.
Kawasaki Ninja 205 R. On the market for three years, the little ninja has to admit defeat to the brand new CBR. The higher peak performance offers few advantages in practice.
Related articles
-
Ducati Monster 821 and Kawasaki Z 800 in comparison test
Ducati Monster 821 and Kawasaki Z 800 in the test Two concepts, one champion Content of The Ducati Monster 821 and the Kawasaki Z 800 belong to the…
-
Kawasaki ZX-10R and BMW S 1000 RR in a comparison test
Kawasaki ZX-10R and BMW S 1000 RR in a comparison test Duel of the giants Content of Shortly after its presentation in hot Sepang, the Kawasaki ZX-10R’s…
-
Kawasaki Z125 and Ninja 125 test: for generation Z or ZX-R bikers ? Unveiled in September, the Z125 and Ninja 125 land in mid-December in dealerships….
-
BMW, Honda, Kawasaki, Suzuki and Yamaha super sports cars in a comparison test
Superbikes 2011 in comparison test Super sports cars from BMW, Honda, Kawasaki, Suzuki and Yamaha Content of The 2011 superbikes with their inline…
-
Comparison test Ducati 916 Biposto, Honda CBR 900 RR and Triumph Daytona T 595
Comparison test of the Ducati 916 Biposto, Honda CBR 900 RR and Triumph Daytona T 595 fire and flame It had to happen that way. Everyone has written it,…
-
Comparison test Aprilia, Ducati, Kawasaki, KTM and Triumph
Aprilia test comparison , Ducati , Kawasaki , KTM and Triumph Cool naked bikes Minimalistic, aggressive, greedy and cool ?? Naked bikes focus the…
-
Honda Fireblade SP and Kawasaki ZX-10R in the test
Honda Fireblade SP and Kawasaki ZX-10R in the test High-performance reactors on country roads and racetracks The engine and chassis of the Honda…
-
Cruiser comparison test: Honda VTX 1300 S, Kawasaki VN 1600 Classic
Cruiser comparison test: Honda VTX 1300 S , Kawasaki VN 1600 Classic Damn long hard Handy six-centimeter chunks, wheelbases begging in the parking bay,…
-
Kawasaki Ninja 300 and KTM RC 390 in the test
Kawasaki Ninja 300 and KTM RC 390 in comparison test Not just for beginners The Kawasaki Ninja 300 is already very popular. It is now facing competition…
-
Comparison test Honda CB 650 F, Yamaha TRX 850, Suzuki SV 650 S and Yamaha MT-07
Honda CB 650 F, Yamaha TRX 850, Suzuki SV 650 S and Yamaha MT-07 in comparison test Cheap new releases or tuned used ones? Content of Cheap new releases…
Related articles
-
Comparison test of the 1000 great sports car, part 1 The full program Lean, strong, ready for attack, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 completes the field of power…
-
MotoGP – Moto GP: Casey Stoner tests the Ducati at Misano – Used Ducati
Test: Honda Crossrunner against VFR 800 Honda tourer in comparison test Content of Honda grabbed the V4 engine that has been known for years from the VFR…
-
MotoGP – Moto GP – Valencia: the last lesson of Master Stoner –
Technology and driving reports: Tuning-VTR 1000 F One two three The world was waiting for the Japanese 916 hunter, the world got a Japanese country road…
-
Kawasaki Z125 Pro The mini-zett that we don’t get In the US, Kawasaki countered the success of the Honda MSX with the Z125 Pro. It doesn’t have much in…
-
MotoGP – Moto GP: Ducatis have helpers at the Red Bull Ring! –
Test: eight bikes for the country road In the big country road test: BMW, Ducati, Honda, Kawasaki, KTM, Suzuki, Triumph and Yamaha Content of If everyone…
-
MotoGP – Randy then Nicky freak out the clock! –
Comparison test: Kawasaki Versys 1000, Kawasaki Z 1000 SX , Kawasaki Z 1000 The 1000s interpretations of Kawasaki Content of Take the famous…
-
MotoGP – Statements and Analysis of the Indianapolis GP MotoGP – Statements and Analysis
Kawasaki ZX-10R and BMW S 1000 RR in a comparison test Duel of the giants Content of Shortly after its presentation in hot Sepang, the Kawasaki ZX-10R’s…
-
MotoGP – Moto 3 race in Jerez: Fenati doubles the bet –
Mid-range motorcycles from Kawasaki and KTM Comparison test: Kawasaki ER-6n and KTM 690 Duke Content of Middle-class motorcycles are often smiled at and…
-
MotoGP – Australian Grand Prix: the Stoner method! – The Stoner Island Grand Prix!
Innovations 2004: Driving report Kawasaki KX 250 F Late bloomer With a significant delay, Kawasaki is now jumping on the four-stroke train that Yamaha…
-
MotoGP – Stoner test rider of the official Honda –
BMW K 1200 GT test comparison , Honda Pan European , Yamaha FJR 1300 A Flying Dutchmen The opportunity has never been better: three express tourers are…