Honda Crossrunner and Suzuki V-Strom 1000 in comparison test
Niche duel of travel enduro bikes
The Honda Crossrunner has more power than normal 800 cc touring enduros, and the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 with 1037 cm³ is between these and the 1200 cc. Because they are so different, both find their niche in the intermediate realm.
Who between the Honda VS.Rossrunner and the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 switches back and forth, experiences two engine concepts that could hardly be more different. One would almost think that the developers, in a kind of reverse external control, avoided precisely those characteristics of their machine that are particularly pronounced in the other. That is of course not the case.
Honda Crossrunner and Suzuki V-Strom 1000 in comparison test
Niche duel of travel enduro bikes
Honda Crossrunner with the higher peak performance
Regarding the character differences mentioned: The Honda Crossrunner’s 782 V4 is a high-speed engine. At the bottom he pulls out without complaint, but not particularly committed. The term “tired” would also be allowed. When the mechanics of his Vtec system move him from a two-valve to a four-valve engine from 6500 rpm, the power and especially the torque take a steep upswing. Extrapolated to one liter of displacement, it exceeds the limit of 100 Nm and thus shows that it is a thoroughly efficient engine. Admittedly with characteristics that not everyone likes.
The V2 of the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 draws 100 Nm from 1037 cm³ displacement and is by far more powerful than the Honda V4. 20 Nm more at the top, which is also applied at a rested 6600 rpm, do their job. Even more: from just over 3000 to around 7000 rpm, the torque of the V-Strom is consistently over 90 Nm. Anyone can easily imagine how it feels when accelerating out of a curve – powerful. This feeling is proven by the much better pulling power of the Suzuki, while the acceleration values are determined continuously in the optimal speed range, in which the higher peak performance of the Honda Crossrunner works to your advantage.
In the upper speed range, when the Honda V4 ignites properly, the Suzuki V2 again slacks off. A comparatively early upshift at around 7500 rpm keeps it in the optimal range, spares your nerves and your wallet, while the Honda V4 likes to turn up to 11,000 rpm. In practice, unfortunately, nobody can drive the Honda Crossrunner exclusively in the area in which your engine feels particularly comfortable. On winding roads in particular, you constantly switch between two-valve operation below 6500 rpm and four-valve operation above it, especially since the Crossrunner is geared so long that the speed in tight bends drops far even in first gear. Many drivers are annoyed by the constant change in temperament and engine sound. Overall, the performance characteristics of the engine of the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 are much better suited to the purpose of the two motorcycles.
Tourer
Test: Honda Crossrunner against VFR 800
Honda tourer in comparison test
read more
Honda transmission with greater ease of use
However, when it comes to factors such as smooth running or throttle response, the pendulum swings in the direction of the Honda Crossrunner. The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 engine, which has been further developed since its debut in the Suzuki TL 1000 S with sometimes more and sometimes less vigor, is undoubtedly one of the most cultivated of the large two-cylinder engines. It only stomps when you torment it at low revs and vibrates only moderately. But the Honda V4 opens up a completely different level of running culture. In contrast to four-cylinder in-line engines, instead of vibrations, it only develops a gently massaging pulsation, which never feels tingly even at the highest speeds.
And although the drive train of the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 shows less play in load changes than that of the Honda Crossrunner, the Honda driver can get his machine back under tension more quickly at the apex of slow corners and with less effort on concentration. On pass roads, this makes up a few meters in every bend, which are gained without effort. The better shiftability of the Honda transmission also contributes to the impression of greater ease of use.
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 has longer caster and wheelbase
A look at the basic geometric data shows that the two candidates in this comparison also pursue very different goals when designing their chassis. This comparison is not just gray theory, but almost a teaching example of how the different characteristics of individual parameters are noticeable in driving practice. The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 has a longer caster and wheelbase than the Honda Crossrunner. Your steering head is one degree steeper than that of the Honda, but because of the different sizes of the front wheels, this value cannot be directly compared. The long wheelbase and caster of the Suzuki, and in part also the somewhat higher gyroscopic forces of the 19-inch front wheel, make it very stable in a straight line – at the price of higher steering forces. Despite its flatter steering head and wider tires, the Honda turns more easily.
In the area of medium inclines, the slight inertia of the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 turns into the opposite; it tips into lower altitudes faster than the driver would like. Especially when the grip conditions are not optimal, this tendency to tilt is irritating. It is quite possible that, in an attempt to overcome the aforementioned inertia, one pulls over something when turning in. After getting used to it, that goes away, but when you switch from one machine to another, the effect is always noticeable. With the series tires, the Bridgestone BW 501/502 in special specification "J", it was lower than with the standard tires of this type and it could not be completely eliminated.
Motorsport
IDM Superbike 1000
De Boer is Yamaha’s hope
read more
Honda wants to be steered with a light hand
The shorter Honda Crossrunner not only turns easier, but also pampers you with homogeneous steering behavior. The prerequisite for this, however, is that the original ratio of front and rear height is maintained. In order to gain more lean angle in the blink of an eye, the testers simply tensioned the rear of the vehicle, but this caused a nervous steering behavior. Especially in deeper lean angles, the front wheel guidance appeared indifferent and no longer instilled absolute trust in the grip of the front tire. The wide handlebars also contribute to this, the leverage of which, in combination with the low steering forces, turns every small movement of the driver into an effective steering impulse. The Honda wants to be steered with a light hand.
Both motorcycles also showed major differences when it came to the coordination of the suspension elements. They ensure that the motorcycles behave differently than you would expect them to. The Suzuki is tightly tuned in terms of suspension and damping. This means that it can offer less suspension comfort than the softly sprung, gently dampened Honda Crossrunner despite longer suspension travel. And although the tire dimensions of the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 point at least a bit in the direction of off-road suitability, the Honda can cope better with bumpy slopes on its 17-inch wheels.
On the other hand, the sports tire dimensions of the Honda tires suggest a road sportiness that the motorcycle does not have at all. If you want to drive fast on winding roads in good weather and road conditions, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 is much better off. The precise wheel guidance of the upside-down fork and ample damping reserves create confidence, while the Honda Crossrunner looks doughy and urges caution.
Technical data and measured values
markus-jahn.com
The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 has a longer caster and wheelbase than the Honda Crossrunner.
engine
Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
type design | Four-cylinder four-stroke- 90 degree V engine |
Two-cylinder four-stroke- 90 degree V engine |
injection | 4 x Ø 36 mm | 2 x Ø 45 mm |
coupling | Multi-panes- Oil bath clutch |
Multi-disc oil bath clutch (anti-hopping) |
Boron x stroke | 72.0 x 48.0 mm | 100.0 x 66.0 mm |
Displacement | 782 cc | 1037 cc |
compression | 11.8: 1 | 11.3: 1 |
power | 78.0 kW (106 hp) at 10,250 rpm |
73.5 kW (100 PS) at 8000 rpm |
Torque | 75 Nm at 8500 rpm | 103 Nm at 4000 rpm |
landing gear
Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
frame | Bridge frame made of aluminum |
Bridge frame made of aluminum |
fork | Telescopic fork, Ø 43 mm |
Upside-down fork, Ø 43 mm |
Brakes front / rear | Ø 310/256 mm | Ø 310/260 mm |
Systems assistance | ABS, traction control | ABS, traction control |
bikes | 3.50 x 17; 5.50 x 17 | 2.50 x 19; 4.00 x 17 |
tires | 120/70 R 17; 180/55 R 17 | 110/80 R 19; 150/70 R 17 |
Tires | Pirelli Scorpion Trail | Bridgestone BW 501/502 "J" |
measurements and weight
Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
wheelbase | 1475 mm | 1555 mm |
Steering head angle | 63.5 degrees | 64.5 degrees |
trailing | 103 mm | 109 mm |
Front / rear suspension travel | 145/148 mm | 160/160 mm |
Seat height¹ | 810-830 mm | 860 mm |
Weight with a full tank¹ | 245 kg | 249 kg² |
Payload¹ | 187 kg | 191 kg |
Tank capacity / reserve | 20.8 liters | 20.0 liters |
Service intervals | 12,000 km | 12,000 km |
price | 11,695 euros | 12,290 euros |
Price test motorcycle | 11,695 euros | 13,664 euros³ |
Additional costs | 295 euros | 250 euro |
MOTORCYCLE readings
Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
Top speed * | 209 km / h | 205 km / h |
acceleration | ||
0-100 km / h | 3.7 sec | 4.0 sec |
0-140 km / h | 6.3 sec | 6.8 sec |
0-200 km / h | 15.8 sec | 19.4 sec |
Draft | ||
60-100 km / h | 5.4 sec | 3.7 sec |
100-140 km / h | 6.4 sec | 4.2 sec |
140-180 km / h | 8.5 sec | 6.4 sec |
Consumption country road / 100 km | 4.8 liters / super | 5.0 liters / normal |
Reach country road | 433 km | 400 km |
* Manufacturer information; 1 MOTORCYCLE measurements; 2 with the accessories listed below; 3 crash bars (175 euros), pannier racks (232 euros), aluminum rack (107 euros), hand protectors (75 euros), heated grips (210 euros), main stand (200 euros), front spoiler (175 euros), tank pad (25 euros), Touring disc (175 euros).
Performance measurement
markus-jahn.com
Power on the crankshaft. Measurements on the Dynojet roller test stand 250, corrected according to 95/1 / EC, maximum possible deviation ± 5%.
The impressive torque curve of the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 shows what the engineers aimed at when redesigning the engine: The former sports engine was trimmed for as much torque as possible at low speeds. In complete contrast to this, the V4 of the Honda Crossrunner, which only really gets going when you have long been able to shift into the next gear on the V-Strom. The point at which the Honda-Vtec activates the second valve group and the engine is allowed to breathe through four valves becomes clear, but also less sharply than in previous years.
MOTORCYCLE scoring
markus-jahn.com
When it comes to the engine, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 is one step ahead.
engine
maximum number of points | Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
Draft | 40 | 18th | 29 |
acceleration | 40 | 24 | 19th |
Top speed | 30th | 14th | 14th |
Engine characteristics | 30th | 17th | 22nd |
Responsiveness | 20th | 14th | 12th |
Load change | 20th | 13 | 14th |
Smoothness | 20th | 14th | 11 |
coupling | 10 | 8th | 7th |
circuit | 20th | 14th | 13 |
Gear ratio | 10 | 7th | 8th |
Start | 10 | 7th | 9 |
total | 250 | 150 | 158 |
The Honda Crossrunner owes it to its acceleration and smoothness that it is only eight points behind the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 in this chapter. Your lower score in the “starting” criterion is due to a brief swallowing when starting up for the first time after a cold start. This was observed in two test copies.
Winner engine: Suzuki V-Strom 1000
landing gear
maximum number of points | Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
Handiness | 40 | 29 | 28 |
Stability in turns | 40 | 26th | 28 |
Steering behavior | 40 | 30th | 26th |
feedback | 10 | 6th | 7th |
Inclined position | 20th | 16 | 14th |
Straight-line stability | 20th | 17th | 14th |
Suspension tuning in front | 20th | 13 | 12th |
Chassis set-up at the rear | 20th | 13 | 13 |
Adjustment options undercarriage | 10 | 6th | 7th |
Suspension comfort | 10 | 8th | 6th |
Driving behavior with a passenger | 20th | 14th | 13 |
total | 250 | 178 | 168 |
Soft or tight – both are possible if it’s done well. And they are well made, the Honda Crossrunner on the comfortable side, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 on the sporty side. However, the unusual chassis geometry of the Suzuki also causes a not entirely homogeneous steering behavior.
Chassis winner: Honda Crossrunner
everyday life
maximum number of points | Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
Ergonomics driver | 40 | 30th | 29 |
Ergonomics pillion | 20th | 14th | 13 |
Windbreak | 20th | 12th | 14th |
view | 20th | 12th | 13 |
light | 20th | 15th | 13 |
Furnishing | 30th | 23 | 25th |
Handling / maintenance | 30th | 15th | 16 |
Luggage storage | 10 | 1 | 5 |
Payload | 10 | 5 | 5 |
Tidy | 30th | 28 | 25th |
processing | 20th | 14th | 13 |
total | 250 | 169 | 171 |
In principle everything is fine with the ergonomics of the Suzuki, but you sit better on the Honda Crossrunner – even as a pillion passenger. At this point, a small, often ignored detail should be appreciated: The long mirror arms of the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 provide an exceptionally good view to the rear.
Winner everyday: Suzuki V-Strom 1000
security
maximum number of points | Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
Braking effect | 40 | 31 | 30th |
Brake metering | 30th | 23 | 22nd |
Braking with a passenger / fading | 20th | 14th | 13 |
Righting moment when braking | 10 | 8th | 8th |
ABS function | 20th | 14th | 14th |
Handlebar slapping | 20th | 17th | 15th |
Ground clearance | 10 | 8th | 8th |
total | 150 | 115 | 110 |
They have almost identical brakes, and the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 no longer suffers from the Suzuki-typical, blunt friction pairing. Nevertheless, the brake of the Honda Crossrunner responds faster without being too snappy.
Safety winner: Honda Crossrunner
costs
maximum number of points | Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
Garamtie | 30th | 15th | 17th |
Consumption (country road) | 30th | 20th | 19th |
Inspection costs | 20th | 18th | 18th |
Maintenance costs | 20th | 10 | 11 |
total | 100 | 63 | 65 |
The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 owes the slightly lower maintenance costs to its cheaper, narrow tires.
Winner cost: Suzuki V-Strom 1000
maximum number of points | Honda crossrunner | Suzuki V-Strom 1000 | |
Overall rating | 1000 | 675 | 672 |
placement | 1. | 2. | |
Price-performance note | 1.0 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
Price-performance winner: Honda Crossrunner
Three points more for significantly less money make any further explanation superfluous.
MOTORCYCLE test result
1. Honda Crossrunner
The Honda Crossrunner is the motorcycle for people who appreciate comfort and smoothness. Their solid workmanship and their high practical value make them an almost ideal partner for touring and everyday life.
2. Suzuki V-Strom 1000
More robust and powerful than the Honda, tighter and sportier, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 distinguishes itself as the motorcycle for lovers of driving dynamics. Of course, it is still very suitable for long tours.
Related articles
-
Honda Africa Twin, KTM 1050 Adventure and Suzuki V-Strom 1000
Honda Africa Twin, KTM 1050 Adventure and Suzuki V-Strom 1000 1000cc travel enduro in comparison test It stands for wanderlust and adventure. But in the…
-
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 in the top test
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 in the top test Long range, high payload, low weight In terms of performance and price, the new Suzuki V-Strom 1000 should hit the…
-
Comparison test touring enduro bikes: Honda Transalp, Kawasaki Versys, Suzuki V-Strom 650
Comparison test of travel enduro bikes: Honda Transalp, Kawasaki Versys , Suzuki V-Strom 650 Always along the wall Travel enduro doesn’t necessarily mean…
-
Comparison test of the 1000 super sports car in 2006
Comparison test of the 1000 super sports car in 2006 The show must go on The mystery repeats itself. Whenever we think that nothing is going up, the next…
-
Comparison test of the 1000 super sports car, part 1
Comparison test of the 1000 great sports car, part 1 The full program Lean, strong, ready for attack, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 completes the field of power…
-
BMW F 800 GT, Kawasaki Z 1000 SX and Honda VFR 800 F in the test
BMW F 800 GT, Kawasaki Z 1000 SX and Honda VFR 800 F in the test Sports tourers in comparison Travel sportily or drive comfortably fast – these are the…
-
Comparison test Multistrada 950 Vs Africa Twin Vs V-Strom 1000: right on target Since its release in January 2016, the Honda Africa Twin has met with a…
-
Comparison test Multistrada 950 Vs Africa Twin Vs V-Strom 1000: right on target Since its release in January 2016, the Honda Africa Twin has met with…
-
Comparison test Honda Hornet, Suzuki GSF 600 S Bandit, Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer
Honda Hornet test comparison , Suzuki GSF 600 S Bandit , Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer No more fun The carefree days of the Suzuki Bandit seem to be numbered….
-
Honda Fireblade vs. Suzuki GSX-R 1000 in comparison test
The last oven -cylinder without control electronics Test: Honda Fireblade against Suzuki GSX-R 1000 Content of They are the last current four-cylinder…
Related articles
-
Moto Tour – Dark Dog Moto Tour 2012 (D5): war is declared! –
Honda Africa Twin, KTM 1050 Adventure and Suzuki V-Strom 1000 1000cc travel enduro in comparison test It stands for wanderlust and adventure. But in the…
-
Moto Tour – DDMT 2011 – D4: Denis Bouan, marathon man! –
Honda CB 1000 R + (2018) in the top test How good is the new naked bike? Is the Honda CB 1000 R + such a cornering sweeper that the hats fly when you…
-
Moto Tour – Dark Dog Moto Tour: tomorrow, the big start! –
Honda CB 650 F in the top test Just ride a motorcycle Stand out at any cost? Let the others do that. The new Honda CB 650 F is not looking for a trainer…
-
Moto Tour – Videos of the Dark Dog Moto Tour 2012 stages – MNC Special Envoy on DDMT stages
Honda NC 700 S and Yamaha XJ6 ABS in the test Comparison of the mid-range all-rounder with 48 hp The goal of the Honda NC 700 S and Yamaha XJ6 ABS is the…
-
Moto Tour – The road specials of the Dark Dog Moto Tour in video – Jeanvais special (01): quick rows
Honda Hornet 900 model 2004 With new parts Funny winter ?? the sled from the happy blowing snow last week is still in front of the door, and a motorcycle…
-
Moto Tour – Frederic Moreira tries everything for everything … –
Honda CBR 650 F, Suzuki GSX 650 F, Yamaha XJ6 Diversion F in the test F for disguise Don’t worry, not everything fell victim to the spelling reform. In…
-
Moto Tour – The DDMT 2011 specials on video! – S2: La Pochinière, the miniature TT (3.8 km)
Honda Fireblade SP and Kawasaki ZX-10R in the test High-performance reactors on country roads and racetracks The engine and chassis of the Honda…
-
Moto Tour – Videos of the Dark Dog Moto Tour 2012 specials – La Croisette special (74)
Entry-level bikes from Honda and BMW put to the test Honda NC 700 X against BMW G 650 GS The new 48 hp driver’s license class for beginners is already…
-
Moto Tour – DDMT 2013 – Stage 7: shortened route in Toulon –
Honda CB 1000 R, Kawasaki Z 1000 SE and Yamaha FZ1 in the test Three Japanese naked bikes in comparison More nasty, more aggressive, more aggressive -…
-
Top test: Honda NC 700 X The all-rounder from Honda at a budget price In line with the new driving license regulations (from 2013), Honda is already…