Chopper from Triumph, Harley Davidson, Kawasaki and Honda put to the test
Comparative test of mid-range cruisers up to 9,000 euros
In the cruiser field, the middle class is very popular. Understandable, because even for less than 9000 euros, you can chill like a master. New: the Harley Sportster 883 L SuperLow and the revised Triumph Speedmaster.
When the pointer on the scales is fairly high, the performance values on the ergometer level down low, the reflection in the mirror is dominated by the contours of the broad hips instead of defined shoulders, but everyone still puts their thumbs up and says in admiration, "You look great“ Then only bold daydreams or fake buddies can be the cause. Or you are reborn as a cruiser.
Because in the world of the soft and beautiful, different standards apply. Even if it is, say, a baby cruiser. Because while around 900 cc is enough in real life to break lap records, this cubic capacity is considered a child’s portion in the cruiser profession, which is dominated by 1500 to 1800 engines. Also in terms of price. With a maximum of 9,000 euros, the tariffs remain within a financially justifiable framework. For their larger-displacement sisters at least 4000 euros more hike over the counter.
At first glance, the quartet hardly shows any of this. Opulent and massive, the four puddle comfortably along the country road. How right Karl Marx was then with his thesis: Being determines consciousness. As soon as your bottom has got used to the deep seat, your arms to the protruding handlebars and your upper body to the slightly reclined position, your mind switches to relaxation mode.
In this contemplative environment, the demands on the technology are quickly put into perspective. There is certainly no need for hectic model changes. Hardly anyone cares that the Honda Shadow, apart from one injection, has remained almost unchanged since 2004. It is more likely that the mighty VN 900 Custom from Kawasaki – the only innovation – has been wrapped in matt black from the handlebars to the rear wheel rim instead of glossy this year.
Chopper from Triumph, Harley Davidson, Kawasaki and Honda put to the test
Comparative test of mid-range cruisers up to 9,000 euros
Speedmaster elaborately: 19 instead of 18-inch front wheel, to which now only one instead of two brake discs is screwed, a four instead of 3.5-inch wide rear wheel rim and a seat height reduced by three centimeters thanks to a thinner seat cushion , distinguish the current Briton from hers Previous model.
It is well known that Harley-Davidson is not petty when it comes to expanding its own range of products. Based on the 883 Sportster, the Americans created a new model from their gigantic parts kit with a lower seat, modified handlebars, a 17-liter tank and optically revised wheels: the XL 883 L SuperLow. Irony of naming. It sits deepest not on Harley’s newly appointed flat iron, but on the Honda. The shadow pilot glides over the asphalt just 66 centimeters above the ground. Three centimeters lower than the assembled competition.
Now put aside the tape measure and wallet. The smell of the freshly hacked grain fields hangs over the area, spreading a little melancholy despite the bull heat. When the harvest is in, summer ends, the old farmers know from experience. Hopefully they are not right. Therefore: carpe tempora, use the time.
Jahn
Harley Sportster 883 L Superlow, Kawasaki VN 900 Custom, Honda Shadow 750 C and Triumph Speedmaster.
The Honda leads the small cruiser caravan. Coincidence or Self-Image? Whether the wide fenders, the tank, the headlights, the covers on the fork and strut, the spoked wheels, the covers of the engine and air filter housings or even the smallest detail, the change from shiny black, chrome or polished aluminum parts gives the Shadow an elegant look Noblesse. Which also seems to be reflected in its handlebar shape. Strongly cranked and pulled down, the steering antlers stretch deep in front of the driver. As if it wanted to be guided with delicate fingers and not misused as a handrail against the wind. A reluctance in which the 750 V2 engine involuntarily cooperates. With 44 HP peak power and restrained revving (maximum speed: 6200 / min), the three-valve engine moderates itself excessively compared to its not too lavishly motorized colleagues. Perhaps this should – with all due respect – only underline the homogeneity of the overall concept. Because when it comes to suspension, too, the Shadow had its limits early on. The buttery-soft fork and the underdamped spring struts quickly reach their limits, only please if you take a decidedly leisurely pace. Only in this case is it possible to reside comfortably on the Honda, does the driver also find the opportunity to look forward to two unique selling points. Firstly the only ABS in this quartet and secondly the perhaps less stylish, but low-maintenance cardan drive.
Harley-Davidson has never had a hard time meeting the taste of the target group. Not even with the 883. Even the way the 45-degree V2 pulsates while standing, clearly tugging at its rubber mounts, is a real experience. This increases even more when the long-stroke engine suddenly puts a comfortably low-frequency vibration carpet over the vehicle just above idle speed instead of the expected shaking. It is not a coincidence. Running culture and sound have been explicitly defined goals in model development in Milwaukee for years. Accurate styling too. Especially since Harley of all people avoids the pompous cruiser look here.
Little things like the milled rim flanges of the cast wheels are nicely done, the look of which can be found on the belt pulley on the rear wheel. The hand-drawn decorative lines on the tank also testify to the attention to detail. The only thing that the Americans couldn’t hold back was the engine: the cast iron look of the light metal cylinders and the engine housing comes from the powder paint spray gun. After all, deceptively really successful. Without cruiser regalia, you won’t be surprised at the seating position on the SuperLow. The footpegs attached quite far back may initially irritate, after a few kilometers you even begin to appreciate their position. Because it allows you to sit actively on the Harley. Because with the narrowest wheelbase, the steepest steering head angle and the shortest caster of all test machines, the US bike deliberately differs from the somewhat lethargic cruiser community – if the Yankees had not also referred to the model name SuperLow as the freedom from lean angles . Not least because of the extremely short spring travel of 54 millimeters at the rear, the nipples of the footpegs scrape loudly over the asphalt even at the slightest inclination and the rear of each pothole passes on to the pilot almost unfiltered. It’s a shame, because the overall package has potential for more. The engine feels good in every situation, the brakes decelerate properly, the handling is successful – not to mention the cult factor of a Harley.
Jahn
Harley Sportster 883 L Superlow.
Triumph doesn’t need that. Especially when it comes to the objectively assessable criteria of the engine, the Briton sits in the executive chair. With 58 hp, the air-cooled unit of the Speedmaster is the most powerful, accelerates the fastest, purrs the softest through the speed range and hardly vibrates. It was precisely with these qualities that Triumph won two years ago in the last mid-range cruiser comparison test by MOTORRAD (issue 13/2009). But even then it was said: The facts speak for the British twin – but the emotions do not. At least cruiser purists will still slide on the smoothly polished character of the two-cylinder. The full blow in the lower speed range, the pleasant tingling sensation when the accelerator is opened or even just the bassy V2 sound, the same-runner can hardly offer any of this. Too much subjectivity? No. Because as if reason had not yet been sufficiently satisfied, the Speedmaster was also slowed down during the model revision. Instead of the previous 172 km / h top speed, the Triumph is now only allowed to run at a top speed of 152 km / h with speed-limited fourth and fifth gear. If this topic is ultimately of subordinate importance in a cruiser, circumcision is always surprising. On top of that, it costs a few meters in the MOTORRAD 1000 point evaluation. There is also a deduction for the fact that the new single brake disc at the front can still be metered excellently, but the pilot has to use a little more manual force. Ultimately, the padded seat also contributes to the lack of comfort in the rear. Of course, whining at a high level. Or even on the wrong floor? Because the appearance of the Speedmaster does not always fit into the baroque cruiser look. Whether the only chain drive in the test field, the clearly visible steel flex lines to the oil cooler, the unadorned box swing arm or even the injection system with a constant pressure carburetor look: the details reveal that the guys from Hinckley also understand technology as a stylistic device.
Nevertheless: As long as you are thematically in the cliche of a cruiser, there is hardly a way around the Kawasaki. It is a truly powerful motorcycle. At 280 kilograms, it is by far the heaviest of the four. And yet it is consistent in its monstrosity. Because everything about the VN 900 is big, massive, self-confident. The rigid frame look alone is exceptionally successful. Only at a third glance can the strut hidden behind the side panels be discovered. Or the tank: the mounted instrument console also puts it in the limelight as if it had not already turned out to be huge with its 20 liters content. Or the handlebar: with two very long, bolt-upright and firmly welded risers, it holds the front with a firm grip. Or the belt pulley: one could assume that the 20 kilogram difference between the VN 900 and the competition is due solely to this cast part. Matching it: the massive 15-inch disc wheel.
And the 903 cc engine also behaves appropriately, throwing itself neatly in the chest with its barely significant displacement advantage (Harley: 883 cc, Honda: 745 cc, Triumph: 865 cc). The lovingly ribbed, yet water-cooled propellant delivers the full blow from the lower engine speed expected by choppers, shining up to 4500 rpm with a powerful torque. The fact that it flattens out shortly afterwards and produces just 48 hp from a displacement of just under one liter is forgiven against this background. Because no engine in this mid-range cruiser conveys that big bike feeling better than this 55-degree V2.
The Kawasaki engineers were also right with the largest front wheel of the test squad, a 21-inch cast rim. The narrow tire allows the VN to turn effortlessly in spite of its abundant dimensions, it then keeps its lane cleanly and, despite its narrow-soled dimensions (80/90 21), still offers acceptable grip even when braking. One begins to understand why the VN 900 has long since become one of the best-selling mid-range cruisers in Germany. Above all, it proves that cruising in proper style is not necessarily a question of displacement. The manufacturers manage to clearly define the characters of the engines for mid-range cruisers and build coherent motorcycle concepts around them. Restrained and noble the Honda, lively the Triumph, stylish the Harley and sovereign the Kawasaki. One of the most important findings of this comparison test is that the forehead of this cruiser, which at first glance appears to be so uniform, ultimately offers this nuanced variety on closer inspection.
However, also that the critical braking behavior caused by the unfavorable weight distribution (example Harley SuperLow with driver standing: 58 percent at the rear, 42 percent at the front) seems to be taken seriously by only one manufacturer in the test field. Only Honda offers an ABS. This should give a reason to think. Because the proportion of moderately experienced or occasional riders is particularly high on these affordable and low-profile bikes.
MOTORCYCLE scoring / test result
MOTORCYCLE scoring
engine
With its pronounced torque in the first third of the speed, the Kawasaki hits the nerve of the cruiser faction. Tea Triumph holds against it with unvarnished performance. However, the British woman does not release her 58 hp as impulsively and appropriately as the Kawa, but it is easy to use with low vibrations. It is actually true that the Harley of all things is the fastest in the test field with a top speed of 170 km / h – but also that the Triumph is speed limited in fourth and fifth gear. Her top speed: 152 km / h. While the Harley’s gearshift with long distances and rough gear changes is not very convincing, it is noticeable that the Kawasaki the engine rating with a consistently high rating
wins in all criteria.
Winner engine: Kawasaki
landing gear
Handling is the strong point of the harley. Your short wheelbase and the
moderate dimensions make it easy to deal with the American. However: The footrests, which come down extremely early in bends, are impractical even for cruiser conditions. After the engine classification, the Kawasaki also wins the chassis category. Its strong points: the VN 900 has the greatest freedom of lean angle of the four thanks to the footrests positioned far to the front, it is the easiest to turn in due to the narrow 21-inch front wheel and offers the most reserves of suspension. The Triumph is only just beaten with strong feedback and directional stability. The Honda clearly suffers from its suspension elements that are too soft – even if they ensure good comfort at a moderate pace.
Chassis winner: Kawasaki
everyday life
And again it is the Kawasaki that takes the stage win. Moderate consumption and a large 20-liter tank add up to an impressive 455 kilometers of range. Without pronounced strengths, but also without weaknesses, the Honda pushes itself in front of the Triumph with its inconspicuous appearance. While the Kawasaki offers the most comfortable workplace, the seating for the pillion or the pillion is quite uncomfortable on all four. It’s not much more pleasant to sit on the narrow and sloping cruiser ridesharing facilities than on the jump seats of super athletes.
Winner everyday: Kawasaki
security
ABS – and the case is scratched, one could conclude after the success of the Honda. But the practice is more drastic than what this evaluation suggests. Of all types of motorcycle, cruisers have the most critical blocking behavior on the front wheel. It is therefore completely incomprehensible that three out of four manufacturers forego an ABS. Even after the reduction to a single brake disc, the Triumph brake remains very effective.
Safety winner: Honda
costs
Triumph is the only manufacturer to offer 10,000-kilometer inspection intervals, while Honda and Kawasaki are still at 6,000 intervals. Harley offers new customers a one-year mobility guarantee.
Winner Cost: Harley Davidson
Price-performance
Close race: The relatively small price differences lead to the photo finish in this criterion. The Kawa wins by a hair’s breadth by only a tenth of a note.
Price-performance winner: Kawasaki
Max points | Harley davidson | Honda | Kawasaki | triumph | Overall rating | 1000 | 437 | 453 | 477 | 473 |
placement | 4th. | 3. | 1. | 2. | Price-performance note | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.9 |
MOTORCYCLE test result
1. Kawasaki VN 900 Custom
Successful rigid frame optics, high-torque engine – Kawa knows what is important. No wonder that the VN 900 has been one of the best-selling cruisers for years.
2. Triumph Speedmaster
Lower top speed, less comfort, slimmed down brakes – that’s enough to lose the boss. Nevertheless: still a good bike.
3. Honda Shadow 750 C
The Honda is easy to drive, has a cardan shaft and ABS. But even a cruiser needs more than common sense. Punch and character, for example.
4. Harley 883 L SuperLow
She doesn’t need a Harley bonus. Just more lean angle and suspension travel. Handling and engine are up to date – the Esprit anyway.
Specifications – Harley davidson, Honda
Jahn
Honda Shadow 750 C..
Harley davidson | Engine * |
type design | Two cylinder four stroke 45 degree V engine | injection | 1 x Ø 45 mm |
coupling | Multi-disc oil bath clutch | Boron x stroke | 76.2 x 96.8 mm |
Displacement | 883 cm3 | compression | 9.0: 1 |
power | 39.0 kW (53 PS) at 5900 rpm | Torque | 70 Nm at 3750 rpm |
Landing gear * | frame | Double loop frame made of steel |
fork | Telescopic fork, Ø 39 mm | Brakes v / h | Ø 260 mm / Ø 292 mm |
Systems assistance | – | bikes | 3.50 x 18; 4.50 x 17 |
tires | 120/70 ZR 18; 150/60 ZR 17 | Tires | Michelin Scorcher "11" |
Mass and weight * | wheelbase | 1500 mm |
Steering head angle | 59.0 degrees | trailing | 145 mm |
Suspension travel v / h | 108/54 mm | Seat height ** | 695 mm |
Weight with full tank ** | 259 kg | Payload ** | 195 kg |
Tank capacity / reserve | 17.0 / 3.8 liters | Service intervals | 8000 km |
price | 8,295 euros | Price test motorcycle | 8.775 euros *** |
Additional costs | around 350 euros | MOTORCYCLE readings |
Top speed * | 170 km / h | acceleration |
0-100 km / h | 6.4 sec | 0-140 km / h | 12.8 sec |
0-200 km / h | Draft | 7.2 sec |
60-100 km / h | 8.8 sec | 100-140 km / h | 4.3 sec |
140-180 km / h | 4.9 sec | consumption |
Consumption highway | 4.5 liters of super | Reach country road | 378 km |
Honda | Engine * |
type design | Two cylinder four stroke 52 degree V engine | injection | 2 x Ø 34 mm |
coupling | Multi-disc oil bath clutch | Boron x stroke | 79.0 x 76.0 mm |
Displacement | 745 cm3 | compression | 9.6: 1 |
power | 33.5 kW (46 hp) at 5500 rpm | Torque | 64 Nm at 3500 rpm |
Landing gear * | frame | Double loop frame made of steel |
fork | Telescopic fork, Ø 41 mm | Brakes v / h | Ø 296 mm / Ø 276 mm |
Systems assistance | Compound brake, ABS | bikes | 3.00 x 17; 3.50 x 15 |
tires | 120 / 90-17; 160 / 80-15 | Tires | Bridgestone G 701 / G 702 |
Mass and weight * | wheelbase | 1640 mm |
Steering head angle | 56.0 degrees | trailing | 161 mm |
Suspension travel v / h | 116/90 mm | Seat height ** | 660 mm |
Weight with full tank ** | 261 kg | Payload ** | 189 kg |
Tank capacity / reserve | 14.6 / 3.5 liters | Service intervals | 6000 km |
price | 8,790 euros | Price test motorcycle |
Additional costs | around 170 euros | MOTORCYCLE readings |
Top speed * | 151 km / h | acceleration |
0-100 km / h | 7.8 sec | 0-140 km / h | 19.9 sec |
0-200 km / h | Draft | 8.3 sec |
60-100 km / h | 13.8 sec | 100-140 km / h | 6.5 sec |
140-180 km / h | 9.2 sec | consumption |
Consumption highway | 4.2 liters normal | Reach country road | 348 km |
* Manufacturer information, ** MOTORCYCLE measurements, *** including two-tone paint
Technical data – Kawasaki, Triumph
Honda
Triumph Speedmaster.
Kawasaki | Engine * |
design type | Two-cylinder four-stroke 55 degree V engine | injection | 2 x Ø 34 mm |
coupling | Multi-disc oil bath clutch | Boron x stroke | 88.0 x 74.2 mm |
Displacement | 903 cm3 | compression | 9.5: 1 |
power | 37.0 kW (50 PS) at 5700 rpm | Torque | 78 Nm at 3700 rpm |
Landing gear * | frame | Double loop frame made of steel |
fork | Telescopic fork, Ø 41 mm | Brakes v / h | Ø 300 mm / Ø 270 mm |
Systems assistance | – | bikes | 2.15 x 21; 4.50 x 15 |
tires | 80 / 90-21; 180 / 70-15 | Tires | Dunlop D 404 vo. "J" |
Mass and weight * | wheelbase | 1645 mm |
Steering head angle | 57.0 degrees | trailing | 182 mm |
Suspension travel v / h | 150/103 mm | Seat height ** | 695 mm |
Weight with full tank ** | 280 kg | Payload ** | 178 kg |
Tank capacity / reserve | 20.0 / – liters | Service intervals | 6000 km |
price | 8,895 euros | Price test motorcycle |
Additional costs | around 180 euros | MOTORCYCLE readings |
Top speed * | 154 km / h | acceleration |
0-100 km / h | 6.7 sec | 0-140 km / h | 16.9 sec |
0-200 km / h | Draft | 6.2 sec |
60-100 km / h | 10.3 sec | 100-140 km / h | 4.6 sec |
140-180 km / h | 5.7 sec | consumption |
Consumption highway | 4.4 liters normal | Reach country road | 455 km |
triumph | |
Engine * | |
type design | Two-cylinder four-stroke in-line engine |
injection | 2 x Ø 37 mm |
coupling | Multi-disc oil bath clutch |
Boron x stroke | 90.0 x 68.0 mm |
Displacement | 865 cm3 |
compression | 9.2: 1 |
power | 45.0 kW (61 hp) at 6800 rpm |
Torque | 74 Nm at 3300 rpm |
Landing gear * | |
frame | Double loop frame made of steel |
fork | Telescopic fork, Ø 41 mm |
Brakes v / h | Ø 310 mm / Ø 285 mm |
Systems assistance | – |
bikes | 2.50 x 19; 4.00 x 15 |
tires | 100 / 90R 19; 170 / 80B 15 |
Tires | Metzeler ME 880 marathon |
Mass and weight * | |
wheelbase | 1606 mm |
Steering head angle | 56.2 degrees |
trailing | 170 mm |
Suspension travel v / h | 120/96 mm |
Seat height ** | 690 mm |
Weight with full tank ** | 266 kg |
Payload ** | 184 kg |
Tank capacity / reserve | 19.3 / – liters |
Service intervals | 10,000 km |
price | 8,690 euros |
Price test motorcycle | |
Additional costs | around 350 euros |
MOTORCYCLE readings | |
Top speed * | 152 km / h |
acceleration | |
0-100 km / h | 5.7 sec |
0-140 km / h | 11.9 sec |
0-200 km / h | |
Draft | 6.5 sec |
60-100 km / h | 9.7 sec |
100-140 km / h | 5.5 sec |
140-180 km / h | 10.5 sec |
consumption | |
Consumption highway | 4.7 liters of super |
Reach country road | 411 km |
* Manufacturer information, ** MOTORCYCLE measurements, *** including two-tone paint
Related articles
-
Test: Funbikes from Ducati, Honda, Kawasaki, KTM and Triumph
2011 funbikes test comparison Bikes from Ducati, Honda, Kawasaki, KTM and Triumph in comparison The new concept mix called the Honda Crossrunner is…
-
Cruiser comparison test: Honda VTX 1300 S, Kawasaki VN 1600 Classic
Cruiser comparison test: Honda VTX 1300 S , Kawasaki VN 1600 Classic Damn long hard Handy six-centimeter chunks, wheelbases begging in the parking bay,…
-
Ducati Multistrada 1200, Kawasaki Versys 1000 and Triumph Tiger 1050 in the test
Funbikes in comparison test Ducati Multistrada 1200 , Kawasaki Versys 1000 and Triumph Tiger 1050 With bags and bags on a big tour or just an…
-
Comparison test Honda Hornet 600 ABS, Kawasaki Z 750 ABS and Triumph Street Triple
Honda Hornet 600 ABS test comparison , Kawasaki Z 750 ABS and Triumph Street Triple Weekend Warriors Life is almost sterile. Engines no go along smell of…
-
Test comparison: Honda CB 1000 R, Yamaha FZ1, Triumph Speed Triple, Kawasaki Z 1000
Comparison test: Honda CB 1000 R, Yamaha FZ1, Triumph Speed Triple , Kawasaki Z 1000 Large naked bikes in comparison Content of At its premiere in…
-
Honda, Kawasaki, KTM, Suzuki and Yamaha Crosser in the test
Comparison test: Motocross MX2 (up to 250 cm³) Crossers from Honda, Kawasaki, KTM, Suzuki and Yamaha in the test The Suzuki RM-Z 250 has dominated the…
-
Comparison test touring enduro bikes: Honda Transalp, Kawasaki Versys, Suzuki V-Strom 650
Comparison test of travel enduro bikes: Honda Transalp, Kawasaki Versys , Suzuki V-Strom 650 Always along the wall Travel enduro doesn’t necessarily mean…
-
BMW, Kawasaki, Triumph and Yamaha Tourer in comparison test
Tourer comparison test BMW, Kawasaki, Triumph and Yamaha Tourer in comparison test Tourers represent the sophisticated way of traveling. And the…
-
Comparison test of supersports: Ducati 998 , Honda fireblade , Kawasaki ZX-9R , Suzuki GSX-R 1000 , Triumph Daytona 955i Centennial The K question Five…
-
Test: BMW R1200GS against Honda Crosstourer, Kawasaki Versys 1000 and Triumph Explorer Ras the helmet of the R1200GS? That’s good news: the range of maxi…
Related articles
-
MotoGP – Moto GP: Pedrosa arrives at Le Mans freshly operated … – Used HONDA
Top test Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Injection Really big theater It doesn’t matter which stage the Fat Boy plays on: With sweeping gestures, she takes you…
-
MotoGP – Moto GP: Dani Pedrosa will not compete in the Spanish GP in Jerez –
Hyosung GV 650 Aquila test AquilaSunrise E. A good product is always more than just the sum of its ingredients. Pouring together tequila, orange and…
-
MotoGP – Rossi and Hayden test new parts at Mugello –
Comparison test: 250 cc motocross 2011 The revised 250 cc Crosser in comparison If you don’t want to be sandblasted by your colleagues in motocross, you…
-
MotoGP – MotoGP Catalonia FP3: Marquez and Hayden cause a sensation –
2012 model year of the Streety versus the new 2013 model Triumph Street Triple R old versus new in the top test What do you do when you have a model in…
-
MotoGP – MotoGP Sepang tests – D2: Pedrosa ahead of Espargaro –
Cruiser / chopper test comparison Cruiser around 14,000 euros in comparison Your children are out of the house, the ceiling falls on your head, and the…
-
MotoGP – Australian GP – warm up: Lorenzo and Spies forfeited! –
MOTORRAD readers as test crew (video) The strongest bikes of all classes MOTORRAD invited six owners of the most powerful bikes in all categories to…
-
MotoGP – Moto GP: Stoner disappointed that Honda refused him Pedrosa’s motorcycle –
Top test Triumph Sprint RS Triad dimensions The sound makes the music. Especially when he escapes a famous triple like that of the recently strengthened…
-
MotoGP – Moto GP: Aoyama replaces Pedrosa for 4 to 6 weeks –
BMW K 1200 LT test The steam waltz BMW has renovated its monster tourer. More efficient. More safety. Even more luxury. And the eight-hundredweight chunk…
-
MotoGP – Dani Pedrosa, a good little guy! –
Kawasaki Z 650 in the test (2018) How good is the entry-level bike? The Kawasaki Z 650 was presented in early 2017. To a great success, as it turned out…
-
MotoGP – Moto GP video: the tour of the Red Bull Ring by Dani Pedrosa –
Comparison test, Honda CBR 1100 XX Blackbird, Kawasaki ZZ-R 1100 Honda CBR 1100 XX versus Kawasaki ZZ-R 1100 Away quickly good. Honda’s CBR 1100 XX is…