Kawasaki W 650 / Triumph Bonneville test comparison
Yesterday is today
What have they saved from the character of their historical predecessors, the Kawasaki W 650 and the Triumph Bonneville? And which one is the better Englishwoman?
Now it’s back, the Triumph Bonneville. And wants to show us that it has what it takes to fill the venerable name with new life. Didn’t want to tolerate a Japanese company, Kawasaki, of all things, as the guardian of British heritage. The W 650 is considered the most British bike ever today, more British than anything that has come from Hinckley, the seat of the new Triumph brand, so far. Tea standards should now be adjusted again. Not an easy exercise, as the W 650 had proven that its modern parallel twin, refined with a vertical shaft drive, which in itself does not have a historical model, exactly met the taste of the classic community.
And how did Triumph manage the balancing act between classic and modern? With advanced technology in an engine that just pretends to be from the good old days. And with displacement. 790 cubic centimeters the W 650 is content with 676 cm3 – distributed over the two broadly ribbed, vertical and air-cooled cylinders, which are fed by 36 millimeter Keihin constant pressure carburetors. According to old-fashioned custom, the 86 millimeter thick pistons in the Triumph engine pound up and down at the same time; it is ignited at 360-degree intervals. So much for the conservative element. The British engineers no longer wanted to put up with the gruesome vibrations of their historical model, the T 120 (more on this in the box on page 44), so they built in two balance shafts and gave the crankshaft a four-fold plain bearing. The old Bonneville still had to make do with two bearings. At that time, despite the balancing factor of the crankshaft webs being changed several times, it was never possible to get the consequences of the engine shaking under control. The cylinder head of the new Bonneville is also contemporary. Two chain-driven camshafts open and close each of the four valves via bucket tappets. The combustion chambers are conventionally fed: with a Japanese constant pressure carburetor. They have heating elements that heat the carburetor housing below ten degrees. Progress you can’t see.
With the chassis, however, the Triumph designers haven’t strayed too far from yesterday. Traditionally, the double loop construction made of tubular steel was retained, but it was designed so stiffly that there is hardly any cause for complaint. For example through a massive cast element that houses the steering head and is welded to the actual frame tubes. A tubular strut holds the engine at its upper attachment points. Anyone who thinks that the individual disc brakes at the front and rear are not classic enough is mistaken: the model had had such brakes since 1976.
So far, classic lovers have had to make do with the Kawasaki. The nominally 50 hp air-cooled W 650 engine ?? the test copy even made 56 hp ?? spreads exactly the flair that is required of a classic of modern design. Mainly a credit to the beautifully drawn engine. The twin doesn’t vibrate too much, but not too little either. “Good vibrations” that do not shake off indicators, screws and everything else that is not riveted and nailed down like their ancestors did. How did Kawasaki do it? With plenty of flywheel mass on the four-way bearing crank shaft and a gear-driven balancer shaft in front of it. In the W 650, too, the pistons march up and down at the same time, and the mixture is ignited in a 360-degree rhythm. In keeping with the British role models from the "roaring sixties", the engine is designed with a long stroke. A single camshaft works in the head, each actuating four valves via rocker arms.
The Japanese designers showed a sure instinct in the lines. After all, they were able to study the design documents of the W1 from 1965 in the company‘s own archive and use them as a template. At that time, Kawasaki had already built a twin that resembled a certain BSA 650 like an identical twin. The charm of the 60s is characterized by black lacquered double loop frames, two spring struts, chromium-plated spoked wheels, the same mudguards, teardrop-shaped tank, flat seat, rounded side covers, bellows on the fork, balloon-shaped chrome end pots. That fits, that pleases the nostalgic, who turns his stomach at the sight of bulging aluminum bridge frames and colorful full panels. Sure, with the brakes, coming to terms with the past looks different: A modern disc brake has to be installed in the front wheel. A traditional drum is sufficient at the rear. A good compromise.
Now it’s time to send the two retro machines out onto the slopes. Did their builders succeed in combining the flair of the past with the benefits of today’s technology? First of all, the riding position: on both retro bikes you sit upright with your legs slightly bent and, in the case of the W 650, close your knees, but the handlebars are slightly too wide. On the Triumph, the rider sits even lower, finding the handlebars ideally positioned, a bit narrower than on the Kawasaki.
Start the engines – with an e-starter. If you need it, you can alternatively start the Kawasaki with the kick starter. Very easy, whether cold or warm. Triumph no longer provides this classic starting method. Both engines start flawlessly after a cool night when the choke on the carburetors is pulled. While the Triumph takes a minute to run properly, the W 650 is ready to go right away. By generating a pleasant tremor without nasty tingling in the hands and feet, the Kawasaki twin proves to be a worthy successor to the British two-cylinder of the past. The Bonneville engine, on the other hand, has moved a long way from its origin and has been thoroughly freed from vibrations by means of the two balance shafts.
At first glance, the Triumph’s performance development is a bit disappointing. The real bang only comes at quite high speeds. When exactly can only be guessed while driving, because a rev counter is missing. Now the test bench measurements revealed that the torque curves of the two engines are pretty much the same up to 7000 rpm. Actually a bit sad for the Bonneville twin with its significant increase in displacement that it needs 7000 and more towers to exceed the power of the Kawasaki: 66 hp, six more than stated, compared to the 56 of the Kawasaki. If the gears are turned out, the Kawasaki twin has a hard time following the pace of Triumph. Part of the blame for this is probably the far too long secondary gear ratio of the W 650, forced by the noise measurement regulations. The Triumph gearbox works wonderfully smoothly with short distances, upshifting works fine without the clutch. The gearbox of the Kawasaki works almost as perfectly – with a little more effort.
Both modern oldies show agile cornering behavior thanks to their narrow-tyred wheels – 19-inch at the front. They do not tip over on bumps, nor do they answer harsh braking maneuvers in an inclined position with unsightly steering impulses. The chassis comfort is surprising in view of the simple spring elements. The Triumph in particular has a sensitive, stable telescopic fork with 41 mm stanchions and glides gently over bumps. Only long curves with a bumpy surface that were approached in a very desolate manner cause a good-natured agitation that comes from the rear suspension. The Kawasaki, on the other hand, behaves a little more nervously on patched asphalt or undulating ground. When braking sharply in solo operation, the fork with 39 millimeter stanchion tubes just manages to do it, while it compresses with the passenger up to the stop. Tea rear suspension struts, which have to manage with 85 millimeters of suspension travel, then reach their limits. Above 130 km / h, the straight-line stability leaves a lot to be desired, since the chassis geometry was apparently designed too much towards handiness. The Bonneville, on the other hand, is calm and exudes a certain sedate. Even near the top speed of at least 184 km / h, it doesn’t bother. The W 650 only reaches 168 km / h.
Owners of the 1970s Triumph Bonneville know a thing or two about the rather modest brakes. Especially when the conical duplex drum was stuck in the front wheel, as with the companion machine in this test. In contrast, the counterpart in the new Bonneville works satisfactorily. The perforated disc in the front section, which is gripped by double-piston pliers, is quite effective and low-fading. Can be dosed well, not least because of the steel-sheathed lines. It is supported by the soft disc brake in the rear spoked wheel. Kawasaki’s W 650 can’t quite keep up. Your deceleration system is pleasing due to its comfortable controllability, but with a sporty driving style and especially when a passenger is on board, the front brake could bring a little more reserves with it.
The two retro bikes are otherwise suitable for trips for two. The benches offer enough space. The seating comfort is good with both, but the Bonneville passenger has nowhere to hold on. If the base of the struts is now adjusted to maximum preload with a round steel pin, the ground clearance of the Triumph is more or less sufficient in an inclined position, while the Kawasaki could use a little more of that. Speaking of tools: Triumph made a faux pas. First the seat has to be unscrewed with an Allen key. Otherwise you won’t get the tools. The Kawasaki, on the other hand, is exemplary: a lock sits on the left below the bench. One turn and the bench can be removed, the tools (even with a spoke wrench) are freely accessible.
Fortunately, the fun of riding the two retro bikes is not spoiled by excessive consumption of petrol. At brisk country road speed, 4.8 liters of Super flow through the jets of the Triumph per 100 kilometers, while the Kawasaki consumes 5.5 liters of normal. At a constant speed of 130, 5.8 liters / 100 kilometers were measured.
AT.In the end there is still something to complain about about detailed solutions. Why do various screws on the Kawasaki frame and the fittings of the brake hoses show signs of corrosion after just a few thousand kilometers? And do we still want to do the fiddling about locking the Triumph nowadays, because it doesn’t have a central ignition / steering lock? Anyway. Triumph comes late, but not too late. The better classic is now as it was then called Bonneville. Besides its origins, the Kawasaki wasn’t missing much: maybe a little more displacement, a more stable chassis and a clever translation. Good vibrations definitely has it.
Kawasaki W 650 / Triumph Bonneville test comparison
Yesterday is today
The classics – Triumph Bonneville and Kawasaki W 1
The best-selling European motorcycle of the 1960s was called the Triumph Bonneville. The long-stroke two-cylinder synchronous motor with a displacement of 650 cm3, whose name comes from record drives on the salt lake in Utah, has been the prototype of the large, sporty oven-stroke engine since 1959. The two cylinder bores were located in a cast iron block, the two valves each were actuated via bumpers. The gearbox and crankcase were separate until 1962. Later, the motor and transmission housings formed a vertically divisible unit, the duplex primary chain ran in an oil bath. Like the T 120 model from 1972, which is unfortunately not quite original, shown here. The Bonneville was a powerful Sprinter, the engine developed 49 hp in 1972 at 7200 tours. Was it bought for its enormous torque for the time? MOTORCYCLE measured 53 Nm at 5500 rpm? thanks to the high piston speed due to the large stroke of 83 millimeters: 19.7 m / sec at 7200 / min. AT Good city was not at full throttle. But thanks to a weight of 187 kilograms with a full tank, it is very manoeuvrable. Triumph‘s success spurred Kawasaki to build a large twin as well. The Meguro Manufacturing Company, which was part of Kawasaki, had previously practiced copying English motorcycles. With the W1, launched in 1965 ?? In the picture the only existing example owned by the German Kawasaki importer – the Japanese simply built a BSA A 10 from 1961. With a carburetor it was good for 47 hp at 6500 rpm, the torque was also on the level of Triumph. A best seller in Japan, nobody in Europe wanted them.
2nd place
It comes very close to the ideal of the old two-cylinder classics made in Great Britain. Especially in the optics and the appearance of their vertical shaft-controlled synchronous machine. So far, lovers of parallel twins have had no choice but to purchase this very Kawasaki W 650. Small chassis weaknesses and the too long secondary ratio forced by the noise measurement let the W 650 take a back seat to the Triumph.
1st place
Almost late, the long-awaited Bonneville has taken the place among retro bikes that it deserves. In direct succession to her ancestor of the same name from the 1960s. Triumph has managed to combine modern technology with the flair of the good old days in the new Bonneville. For purists, the engine may seem too smooth and the look watered down. One can argue about it. But not about the successful overall concept.
Related articles
-
Kawasaki Z 750 B, Triumph Bonneville 750 and Yamaha XS 650
Kawasaki Z 750 B , Triumph Bonneville 750 and Yamaha XS 650 Comparison of parallel twins Content of Parallel twins have a long tradition. In England. Can…
-
Comparison test Powercruiser Kawasaki VN 2000 , Suzuki Intruder M 1800 R , Yamaha XV 1900 Midnight Star Punchtime Nobody distributes more displacement…
-
Comparison test BMW F 700 GS Vs Kawasaki ER-6f Vs Yamaha Tracer 700: on the road ! To complete our first test of the Tracer 700, Yamaha’s new…
-
Triumph Street Twin and Triumph Bonneville T100 in comparison
Triumph Street Twin and Triumph Bonneville T100 in comparison Heart is triumph! Two motorcycles, one story. The Triumph Bonneville brings legends to…
-
Top test: Kawasaki VN 1700 Classic
Top test, Kawasaki VN 1700 Classic Kawasaki VN 1700 Classic The design from a single source, as always. In addition, even more displacement, more punch…
-
Test comparison: Honda CB 1000 R, Yamaha FZ1, Triumph Speed Triple, Kawasaki Z 1000
Comparison test: Honda CB 1000 R, Yamaha FZ1, Triumph Speed Triple , Kawasaki Z 1000 Large naked bikes in comparison Content of At its premiere in…
-
Triumph Street Twin test: the little Bonneville of the 21st century With its new 900 cc water-cooled engine, its neat look and its completely revised…
-
All the Duels – Kawasaki W800 Vs Triumph Bonneville SE: grannies resist – Like a fish in water
Kawasaki W800 Vs Triumph Bonneville SE: The Grannies Are Resisting Your ZXG-R cost you 6 license points? Madame no longer supports the passenger seat of…
-
Comparison test Kawasaki KLR 650-Yamaha XT 600 E.
Kawasaki KLR 650 / Yamaha XT 600 E comparison test. Simple and poignant The XT 600 E brings back wistful memories of the great days of single-cylinder…
-
Comparison test Kawasaki GTR 1000, Triumph Trophy 1200, Yamaha FJR 1300
Kawasaki GTR 1000 test comparison , Triumph Trophy 1200 , Yamaha FJR 1300 As time goes by Grayed in honor? and still available: two veteran touring bikes…
Related articles
-
Eicma Milan – 2020 CMX500 Rebel: Honda’s little bobber and bestseller softens – Used HONDA
Kawasaki ER-5 Twister endurance test Number-5 is alive Small, simple motorcycles tend to have long and exhausting lives. The long-distance test ER-5 is…
-
Kawasaki Z 750 B, Triumph Bonneville 750 and Yamaha XS 650
Kawasaki Z 750 B , Triumph Bonneville 750 and Yamaha XS 650 Comparison of parallel twins Content of Parallel twins have a long tradition. In England. Can…
-
Comparison test Kawasaki W 650-Triumph Bonneville
Kawasaki W 650 / Triumph Bonneville test comparison Yesterday is today What have they saved from the character of their historical predecessors , the…
-
MotoGP – David Checa replaces Toni Elias! –
Kawasaki Z 750 B , Triumph Bonneville 750 and Yamaha XS 650 Comparison of parallel twins Content of Parallel twins have a long tradition. In England. Can…
-
Kawasaki KLR 650 / Yamaha XT 600 E comparison test. Simple and poignant The XT 600 E brings back wistful memories of the great days of single-cylinder…
-
Motorcycles – Video test of the 2018 Triumph Tiger 1200 XRT and XCA – Used TRIUMPH
Kawasaki GTR 1000 test comparison , Triumph Trophy 1200 , Yamaha FJR 1300 As time goes by Grayed in honor? and still available: two veteran touring bikes…
-
Discovery – Honda history: the 2018 Monkey descends from the Z100 … – Used HONDA
BMW R 90 S , Kawasaki 900 Z1 and Laverda 1000 3C on the move Big bikes from the 70s Content of Anyone who was into killer performance bikes in the early…
-
Concept comparison: motorcycles for 9,000 marks
Concept comparison: motorcycles for 9, 000 marks We don’t need millions Fortunately, we don’t lack a penny … Honda Vigor 650, Kawasaki ER-5 Twister,…
-
Eicma Milan – New 2019 CB650R roadster in the Honda Neo Sports Cafe family – Used HONDA
Endurance test final balance of the Kawasaki ZX-10R Too good to be stripped After 50,000 kilometers, the door is opened, looked inside and measured….
-
News – The return of the Honda CB500 in 2013 is taking shape! – Used HONDA
Zonko’s attack on the Triumph Thruxton R Lord laurel Content of The 900 Thruxton was a charismatic machine, but not a revelation in terms of sport. The…