Table of contents
- BMW X2City and Metz Moover in the test A comparison of premium e-scooters
- Accelerating with the BMW X2City takes getting used to
- Metz Moover with 12-inch wheels
- Metz Moover is more balanced
- BMW X2City fully charged in just 3 hours
- opinion poll
- Measured values for premium e-scooters
- Points evaluation of premium e-scooters
- Technical data (manufacturer information) Premium e-scooter
Tyson Jopson
25th pictures
Tyson Jopson
1/25
At 2,399 euros (BMW) and 1,998 euros (Metz), the two e-scooters are in the premium segment.
Tyson Jopson
2/25
We measured a range of 25.44 kilometers on the Metz Moover. The charging time is 3 hours and 45 minutes.
Tyson Jopson
3/25
The BMW has a range of 29.4 kilometers and is fully charged again in just 3 hours and 5 minutes.
Tyson Jopson
4/25
The Metz Moover completed the handling course of around 100 meters in 18.954 seconds.
Tyson Jopson
5/25
The BMW X2City is clearly behind with 20.158 seconds, which is solely due to the concept of accelerating – that does not work particularly smoothly with the foot pedal, even for longer practice.
Tyson Jopson
6/25
This also explains why the Metz Moover’s elasticity values are better: it accelerates from 10 to 20 km / h in 4.8 seconds.
Tyson Jopson
7/25
The BMW X2City takes 6.3 seconds to go from 10 to 20 km / h.
Tyson Jopson
8/25
The Metz Moover is folded up in 12.35 seconds
Tyson Jopson
9/25
With the BMW, this is done in 5.86 seconds, whereby we deduct half the number of points in this chapter because we “Fold down the handlebar” not as “folded up” let go.
Tyson Jopson
10/25
Metz has sensible luggage solutions in its range of accessories. The basket and the associated adapter cost 53.80 euros, the lockable top case is available for 69.90 euros.
Tyson Jopson
11/25
The Metz Moover weighs 16.2 kilos, the handlebars are adjustable between 83 and 100 centimeters.
Tyson Jopson
12/25
The BMW X2City weighs 21.2 kilos and the handlebars are adjustable between 88.5 and 101.5 centimeters.
Tyson Jopson
13/25
The two e-scooters are not built for the last mile concept either. They act more as an e-bike replacement, to go for a walk, for an excursion or for a camping holiday.
Tyson Jopson
14/25
The Metzt-Moover driver steps on the gas in a user-friendly way with a thumb throttle, the display only shows the bare essentials: current speed, trip distance, charge level of the battery.
Tyson Jopson
15/25
The smartphone can be connected to the X2City via Bluetooth. In addition to the current speed and the charge status, the display also shows the daily kilometers, average speed, top speed and total distance.
Tyson Jopson
16/25
One looks in vain for a throttle lever on the BMW, this is done by the pedal on the back of the footboard, which unfortunately does not allow continuous acceleration.
Tyson Jopson
17/25
Both e-scooters come without suspension, the 12-inch tires of the Metz Mover have to master the 5-centimeter curb on their own. They do that too, albeit with noticeable blows to the spine. Those who value their bodies and scooters prefer to push.
Tyson Jopson
18/25
In the curb test, however, the BMW X2City can score. Its 16-inch tires dampen the dull ride on the curb.
Tyson Jopson
19/25
The Metz Moover decelerates front and rear with disc brakes. The braking distance from 20 km / h is 2.93 meters.
Tyson Jopson
20/25
The BMW is also anchored with disc brakes. he comes to an exemplary 1.98 meters. In general, however, the braking behavior of so-called small electric vehicles also has a major impact on driving safety.
Tyson Jopson
21/25
The brakes of the BMW X2City are so effective that a healthy balance has to be found between full braking power and safe braking.
Tyson Jopson
22/25
Naturally, we want to know what’s going on and sometimes we really get in.
Tyson Jopson
23/25
For this, the test drivers not only have a helmet on, but also motorcycle boots or motorcycle sneakers, motorcycle gloves, a protective jacket and protective jeans or a leather suit.
Tyson Jopson
24/25
When braking, the BMW X2City came to a stop after just 1.15 meters – albeit sideways and without a driver. Even experienced drivers should not underestimate the braking force on the front wheel.
Tyson Jopson
25/25
Generally important when braking e-scooters: Shift your weight as far back as possible and press firmly against the handlebars with arm force. To be on the safe side, speed up with a few braking maneuvers on safe terrain.
counselor
traffic & business
Premium e-scooters BMW X2City and Metz Moover in the test
BMW X2City and Metz Moover in the test
A comparison of premium e-scooters
The two e-scooters BMW X2City and Metz Moover are in the premium class of e-scooters with prices of around 2,400 and around 2,000 euros. We tested what the two can do and what areas of application they are suitable for.
Dina Dervisevic
06/17/2019
1st place (69 out of 100 points) Metz Moover: The victory is close, but the lead in the chapter driving characteristics is clear. Here the Moover secures points and sympathies thanks to the easily controllable development of power and spontaneously implemented gas commands. The range is okay at a good 25 km, as is the braking distance of 2.93 m. And even if it is not a lightweight – it can at least be folded up to save space. Recommended area of application: city trips or taking to the campsite to be mobile on site.
2nd place (67.1 out of 100 points) BMW X2City: The large tires and the vehicle geometry ensure comfort and stability in the X2City. A look at the built-in material (e.g. hydraulic Magura disc brakes) and the workmanship explain the high price of the BMW (and the short braking distance of 1.98 m). It is also one of the few e-scooters with a removable battery that rolls on. A possible alternative for those who don’t like cycling.
- Driving characteristics[Link on anchor 0]
- security[Link on anchor 0]
- Range[Link on anchor 0]
- Suitability for everyday use[Link on anchor 0]
- processing[Link on anchor 0]
- Readings[Link on anchor 0]
- Scoring
- Technical specifications[Link on anchor 0]
- Favorites of the testers
Driving characteristics
Tyson Jopson
Acceleration, elasticity, top speed, handling course, curb test, gravel, meadow and cobblestone – the winner in the driving characteristics chapter is: Metz Moover.
Both premium e-scooters were approved for road traffic well before the Small Electric Vehicle Ordinance was passed, and both cost a lot of money: the BMW X2City is available for 2,399 euros, the Metz Moover for 1,998 euros. You can expect a lot in terms of driving behavior.
Let’s start with the currently most expensive model on the market, the BMW X2City: With a length of 1.5 m, weight 23 kg and a payload potential of 150 kg, it is a real colossus. All of this rolls on 16-inch pneumatic tires, and you will look in vain for suspension. Is that enough to pass the first test, the cobblestone ride? It is enough, and clearly. BMW can secure 9 out of 10 possible points. The large wheels and the long wheelbase play well together on bad roads and the X2City driver cruises unimpressed on the bumpy slope. Dirt roads, gravel and lawns don’t scare the scooter either. It only slowly reaches its limits on heavily graveled paths. He takes lowered curbs without batting an eyelid and always gives the driver a safe driving experience. BMW, or rather the well-known bicycle company Kettler, which builds the X2City, have reached high up on the shelves for the components of the scooter.
Accelerating with the BMW X2City takes getting used to
However, accelerating takes some getting used to. This is not done, as is usually the case, with the thumb lever or twist grip, the X2City is accelerated by a foot pedal in front of the rear wheel. First, the driver has to use physical strength to accelerate the e-scooter to at least 6 km / h. When he then steps on the pedal, the BMW accelerates to 8 km / h. It only gets faster when the driver takes his foot off the pedal and then steps again. The annoying thing about it: It only goes on in small steps, i.e. to 12, 16, 18 and finally to 20 km / h. You need a lot of practice to master this drive concept really well.
According to the manufacturer, the idea behind the pedal gas was that the driver always had both hands free to give signals when he turned. The BMW X2City only achieved 4 out of 10 possible points for engine response. The drive concept also costs points when measuring the acceleration from 0 to 20 km / h. 10.3 seconds is not a good value, especially since the engine would actually push well if you could accelerate constantly. Even the acceleration from 10 to 20 km / h is not exhilarating at 6.3 seconds.
On the approximately 100-meter-long handling course with slalom and long right-hand bend, it was also evident that you have to practice for a long time in order to quickly curve around obstacles with the X2City. The average time of 20.158 seconds reflects this. The BMW could be much faster if it were easier to operate. This leaves a total of 21.3 points out of 35 possible in the chapter driving characteristics. A value that the Metz Moover can surpass.
Metz Moover with 12-inch wheels
The Metz Moover is more reminiscent of a classic scooter than the BMW X2City. With its 12-inch pneumatic tires, it should also be able to travel reasonably well on bad roads. So off to the cobblestones. Like the X2City, the Metz Moover has no suspension, only the tires ensure comfort. So you are shaken up a bit more here, but the smaller of the two premium e-scooters is still comfortable. It also follows the BMW over unpaved roads and in the meadow. Thanks to its conventional drive system with a thumb lever for accelerating, you immediately feel at home on the Metz, although the chassis and driving stability are at a slightly worse, but still high, level than the X2City. You have to be a little more careful with curbs, as the smaller wheels and the lower ground clearance lead to point deductions here.
The engine’s responsiveness, on the other hand, can only be described as perfect. The testers gave the Moover 10 out of 10 possible points. The throttle is easy to move, the power delivery is easy to dose and the motor implements the commands spontaneously. There is nothing to improve here. These are the best prerequisites for the handling course.
Temporary handling course
This is where the Moover immediately shows its strength. You feel safe, the handling is playful, and so all test drivers quickly put their trust in driving safety. The easy-to-dose brakes are the icing on the cake. With 18.954 seconds, the Moover clearly distances the X2City and leaves it a good second behind. In addition, the time differences between the various test drives are much closer together here. Everyone moves the Metz Moover very quickly.
When accelerating from 0 to 20 km / h, the scooter does not feel particularly lively, which is also confirmed by the measured values: with 9.6 seconds it takes seven tenths off the BMW, but there is still potential for improvement. With a pull of 10 to 20 km / h the Moover then sets a top value with 4.8 seconds – 1.5 seconds compared to the BMW are already worlds in this area.
Conclusion driving characteristics: Overall, the Metz Moover scores 3.5 points more than the BMW in the driving characteristics chapter and lands at 24.8 out of a possible 35 points. Above all, the thumb throttle, the easily adjustable power delivery and the spontaneously implemented throttle commands bring the Metz points and sympathy. The BMW costs the gas pedal, which, with its five speed levels, does not allow for any linear and easily controllable acceleration.
Safety – lights and brakes
Tyson Jopson
During the brake test, the two e-scooters were braked at full speed from 20 km / h. Three testers, several attempts, only those were counted “seasoned” Emergency brakes, i.e. when the driver could still stand on the running board. Winner in the safety chapter: Metz Moover.
Both e-scooters are reasonably priced with decent LED headlights and taillights, which not only ensure sufficient visibility in the dark but also good visibility in traffic. With the Metz Moover, the lamps light up as soon as the e-scooter is activated. With the BMW X2City, they are made to shine with a button next to the display. The tires of the two also have white reflective strips on the side.
Brake light
The rear light of the BMW X2City is also linked to the brakes and lights up brightly when operated, the Metz Moover has no brake light function.
Emergency braking from 20 km / h
The braking distance and braking behavior of the e-scooter are essential in the safety test chapter, which is why we carried out numerous braking tests from 20 km / h with different drivers. Positive for both test candidates: In contrast to most e-scooters below the 1,000 euro limit, both are equipped with disc brakes at the front and rear. As with a bicycle, you brake with the left brake lever at the front and the right one at the rear. Out of interest and for comparison, we took an e-bike with disc brakes to the test site. From 20 km / h it required 2.28 meters of braking distance and remained extremely stable. The legal minimum requirement for the e-scooter is 4.4 meters.
The BMW X2City has an exemplary braking distance of 1.98 meters, while the Metz Moover needs around one meter more in an emergency with 2.93 meters. Why does the Metz Moover win the safety chapter anyway? We find the answer in braking behavior. With its hydraulic Magura disc brake, the BMW has a very clear, tight pressure point, but the stoppers are very snappy. In comparison, the cable brake of the Moover looks almost doughy, but is much more comfortable and stress-free in everyday operation.
It turns out that the big challenge in the construction of the e-scooter is the balance between braking force on the front wheel and the stability of the scooter during braking. The more effective the front brake, the shorter the braking distance, but the greater the risk of a rollover or at least a stoppie – then the rear wheel rises and the e-scooter may not only throw the driver off, but also hit him because each other the rear including the running board rotates. In the worst case, the scooter even lands on the driver. The latter happened to one or the other test driver when they approached the shortest braking distance for the BMW X2City. In everyday traffic, we see the risk that a driver pulls both brake levers fully in the moment of shock, possibly losing control of the e-scooter and injuring himself through too harsh braking behavior.
Metz Moover is more balanced
We therefore value the one meter longer braking distance of the Metz Moover as a safer, because it is a more balanced compromise, with the braking distance being rated three times and the braking behavior twice in the “Safety” chapter.
After buying an e-scooter, we recommend that you first familiarize yourself with the brakes and braking behavior on safe terrain. Is the front brake very snappy? Then it’s better to put a little more strain on the rear brake. However, we must not forget that the rear brake generally has less braking power than the front, as the rear wheel’s grip on the ground is always reduced when braking – even if there is no stoppie.
Conclusion security: The lights on both the BMW X2City and the Metz Moover are exemplary, a brake light is good, but not absolutely necessary. The decisive factors are the braking distance and the braking behavior, whereby the Metz Moover impresses us with its balance in this chapter – its brakes are decent, but not quite as effective as those of the BMW. On the other hand, safe emergency braking with it is easier and, if in doubt, safer for less experienced drivers.
Range and battery
Tyson Jopson
In terms of range and charging speed, the BMW can convince. The range was determined on a set standard lap, two drivers with a body weight of around 80 kg piloted the scooters. Winner in the chapter on range: BMW X2City.
We come to the battery and the range. With the latter, both the Metz and the BMW are at a very good level if you trust the manufacturer’s information. They are between 25 and 30 kilometers. However, many kilometers in an electric car have taught us that the manufacturer’s figures do not always match reality. For this reason, we sent the two rivals with our test drivers (between 75 and 80 kilos) on the roughly two-kilometer consumption lap and let them drive in circles until the batteries were completely empty. So that the conditions are comparable, the two drove together and achieved an average speed of around 19.5 km / h on the partly hilly circuit.
Empty range promises? Nothing!
The Metz Moover lasted for exactly 1:18 hours and with a range of 25.4 kilometers even exceeded the manufacturer’s specification. The BMW came about one and a half laps further and ran out of juice after just over 1:31 hours and 29.4 kilometers. Overall, a respectable performance that the two premium scooters deliver and thus also underline that they are not a last mile but a real commuter or long-distance vehicle – if one can even speak of a long distance in this segment.
The fact that the two scooters get this far is not only due to the 250 watt hub motors, but above all to the batteries. A 216 Wh lithium-ion battery is permanently installed in the Metz Moover footboard. The battery in the X2City has an output of 408 Wh and can be removed, but more on that later.
BMW X2City fully charged in just 3 hours
The fun of the long range is quickly spoiled when the e-scooter is plugged into the socket for half the day. In order to make reliable statements here, too, we hung the two scooters on the measuring socket after the range test with completely empty batteries and experienced a surprise. Despite its significantly larger capacity, the BMW battery was fully charged again after 3:05 hours, 40 minutes earlier than the Metz battery.
In total, the power supply of the X2City drew 400 watts while the Moover was content with 310 watts. The fact that the Moover still hangs on the mains longer is due to the charger. With an output power of 42 volts and two amps, this only comes to 84 watts, while the BMW power pack with 54.4 volts and 2.21 amps has a whopping 120 watts of maximum output. The X2City’s battery calls these up almost continuously, as a look at the charging curve shows. This is very stable with the BMW, while the curve of the Moover rises more slowly, occasionally bends and also drops earlier.
Conclusion range and battery: Thanks to these results, the BMW can clearly win this chapter with 12 out of 15 points, after all it drives on and is fully charged again faster. But the Moover also does well and achieves a very decent result with 10.3 points. Most inexpensive e-scooters below the EUR 1,000 mark have not yet come close to that.
Suitability for everyday use
Tyson Jopson
The Metz Moover is folded up in 12.35 seconds. With the BMW it is 5.86 seconds, although we do not call the state “folded up” let go and therefore deduct half of the score. Winner in the everyday usability section: Metz Moover.
When the battery is full, you want to finally plunge into the fray with your e-scooter. With regard to the driving characteristics, as already mentioned, there is nothing wrong with it. When driving, both e-scooters are very agile despite their generous dimensions, and cannot be upset in city traffic by standard potholes, lowered curbs or other bumps. However, if you suddenly find yourself confronted with a staircase as a driver, the weight of the two scooters could demand a lot of your muscular strength. At 16.2 kilos, the Metz is by no means a flyweight, but the 21.2 kilo BMW wants to be lifted first. Regardless of whether there are actually several steps or just loading the vehicle into a tram – this weight is an obstacle. That is why the gear on the scales results in only one of 10 possible points for the BMW and four of them for the Moover. But that’s not all; Transport by car is also difficult. The lesser evil here is again the Metz, because even if it takes 12.35 seconds to fold the scooter – at least you can fold it. The handlebars of the BMW can be angled. Why? We ask ourselves. There is no significant advantage for the pack size. The only effect is that the X2City is even more difficult to lift and looks like it has been broken. Although the kink in the pole succeeds very quickly with 5.86 seconds, but because one cannot seriously speak of a collapsed state, we halved the resulting seven points to 3.5 points. Before the corks pop at Metz: The Moover only secures three points here because of the fiddly locking mechanism.
On the other hand, the ergonomics of both scooters are excellent. The handlebar height can be adjusted between 83 and 100 centimeters (Metz Moover) or 88.5 and 101.5 centimeters (BMW X2City). This should cover a wide range of heights of potential drivers and we give the maximum number of ten points twice. The premium scooters collect additional plus points with their generously dimensioned running boards, which guarantee a secure stance. The BMW also gets a bonus because its battery can be removed. This means that even as a tormented attic apartment owner you don’t have to drag the entire vehicle up to the top to charge. But with the weight it would have been an unreasonable expectation.
Technical equipment of the premium e-scooter
The technical equipment is manageable for both. The display of the X2City deserves a special mention. It is fully graphic, has a good resolution and is easy to read. The speed step adjustment on the small rocket symbol is an open question in terms of usability. The Metz display, on the other hand, looks unadorned, but at least shows all relevant information (mileage, charge status and speed). Incidentally, on the Metz one can really speak of a pure display, because there are no buttons. The power button sits, unhappily positioned, at the bottom of the handlebar. However, it is not the case that you press the button and then drive off. First the scooter boots for a few seconds and then asks that the brakes be tested before you can start. This procedure gets on your nerves pretty quickly. Not that the BMW has not found a way to strain the patience of its drivers – just to remind you of the step-by-step propulsion with the foot pedal.
opinion poll
Which of the two e-scooters would you choose??
Voted 12 times
Metz Moover
BMW X2City
In the end, the Metz Moover prevails in the section on everyday suitability, which is mainly due to its more compact dimensions and lower weight. The Metz grabs 7.4 out of 15 possible points. The overweight BMW, on the other hand, is only allowed to post 6.8 on the meter account.
processing
What the X2City had to lose because of its plumpness, it benefits in terms of workmanship. The scooter looks almost indestructible, nothing rattles and all parts are firmly in place where they should be. In addition, the handles are ergonomically shaped and feel comfortable. In the sum of all advantages, that was worth nine out of ten points. They should have sanded a few seams, at BMW. The Metz also scores eight points because it is a bit smaller than its opponent. The wooden running board looks neat, but it squeaks and creaks a little. In addition, as already indicated, the locking mechanism of the folding mechanism does not give the impression that it was designed to last forever. The basic construction, however, is quite solid and made to inspire confidence and does not give cause for criticism.
Measured values for premium e-scooters
| Readings | BMW X2City | Metz Moover |
|---|---|---|
| Driving characteristics | ||
| Acceleration 0 – 20 km / h | 10.3 s | 9.6 s |
| Elasticity 10-20 km / h | 6.3 s | 4.8 s |
| Top speed | 21.5 km / h | 21 km / h |
| Handling course (around 100 meters) | 20.158 s | 18,954 s |
| security | ||
| Braking distance from 20 km / h | 1.98 m | 2.93 m |
| battery pack | ||
| Range | 29.4 km | 25.44 km |
| Loading time | 3:05 h | 3:45 h |
| Suitability for everyday use | ||
| Collapsed in … | 5.86 s * | 12.35 s |
| Weight | 21.2 kg | 16.2 kg |
Points evaluation of premium e-scooters
| BMW X2City | Metz Moover | |
| Driving behavior * (max. 35 points) | 21.3 points | 24.8 points |
| Security * (max. 25 points) | 18 points | 18.5 points |
| Battery * (max. 15 points) | 12 points | 10.3 points |
| Suitability for everyday use * (max. 15 points) | 6.8 points | 7.4 points |
| Processing * (max. 10 points) | 9 points | 8 points |
| total score | 67.1 points | 69 points |
Technical data (manufacturer information) Premium e-scooter
| BMW X2City | Metz Moover | |
| Motor type, position and power | Geared hub motor in the rear wheel, 250 watts | Geared hub motor in the rear wheel, 250 watts |
| Brake design | hydraulic disc brakes from Magura front and rear – both operated by hand lever | mechanical disc brake (cable) front and rear – both operated by hand lever |
| landing gear | without suspension | without suspension |
| Tires and wheels | 16 inch tubular tire | 12 inch tubular tire |
| lighting | LED front and rear, including brake light | LED front and rear |
| Battery type | Lithium ions | Lithium ions |
| Battery capacity and voltage | Capacity: 408 Wh; Voltage: 46.8V | Capacity: 210 Wh; Voltage: 36V |
| Payload | 130 kg | 94 kg |
| Purchase price | 2,399 euros | 1,998 euros |
The favorites of the testers
Tyson Jopson
The bike grouch likes the BMW as an e-bike alternative, the camper prefers the Moover, the price-conscious don’t want e-scooters at four-digit prices and a tester would decide differently depending on the area of application.
Christian Becker: “A scooter for 2,000 euros and up is actually out of the question for me, as the concept should actually be a cheap alternative for the last mile. But if I had to choose one of the two test candidates, then it would definitely be for the Metz Moover. It is more handy, can be folded up, costs less and is, for me, the more coherent overall package.
Dina Dervisevic: “In my opinion, both premium e-scooters are not designed for the last mile, but can be seen as serious alternatives to bicycles or e-bikes. If I were to prioritize excursions and tours, the BMW X2City offers the more comfortable package for me. However, when I’m mainly in town and confronted with many stops and changes in pace, I see the Metz Moover in front. “
Patrick Lang: “I would definitely choose the Metz Moover. The full torque is a pleasure, and the brakes are easier to control than on the BMW. The start-up procedure is annoying, but when the part is ready to go, it’s all over. With the X2City, on the other hand, I would have to bother with this strange pump drive all the time, which I don’t think is really suitable for everyday use. “
Luca Light: “Without question, I would choose the BMW X2City – even if I have to admit that accelerating the Metz Moover is much more comfortable. In all other respects, however, the BMW stole the show from the Metz for me. The removable battery, the workmanship and above all the chassis have done it to me. Down the mountain at 50 km / h? Possible without a single worry line, the colossus is so full on the street. And the brakes? Sure, they are snappy, but they offer excellent feedback and a clearly defined pressure point. “
Related articles
-
E-scooters in the test: Xiaomi M365, Segway Ninebot ES2 and Moovi
Tyson Jopson 33 pictures Tyson Jopson 1/33 We tested three e-scooters in comparison: the Xiaomi M365 (purchase price: 499 euros), the Segway Ninebot ES2…
-
York’s s1-elite e-scooter – test drive with a near-series prototype
Svenja Faust 20th pictures Svenja Faust 1/20 20 km / h doesn’t sound like much, but with the right acceleration it gets down to business quickly. Svenja…
-
Single test of the KTM 1190 Adventure
Jahn motorcycles Single test of the KTM 1190 Adventure Top test: KTM 1190 Adventure Rally Express From scratch, with a powerful boost in performance and…
-
Comparison test: Honda Hornet, Kawasaki Z 750, Suzuki GSR 600
Jahn motorcycles Comparison test: Honda Hornet, Kawasaki Z 750, Suzuki GSR 600 Comparison test: Honda Hornet, Kawasaki Z 750, Suzuki GSR 600 ABS shooters…
-
counselor technology & future Technology: big brake test Technology: big brake test Fear eats up the soul Decreasing braking effect up to total failure -…
-
Motorcycle anti-lock braking systems in a comparison test
Jahn 13th pictures Jahn 1/13 The relations shift on the wet test track – in the truest sense of the word. Jahn 2/13 In conclusion, it can be said that…
-
BMW C evolution Long Range in the test
Achim Hartmann motorcycles BMW C evolution Long Range in the test BMW C evolution Long Range in the test Plug in and wait It takes the BMW C evolution…
-
Endurance test final balance Honda CBF 1000
Bilski motorcycles Endurance test final balance Honda CBF 1000 Endurance test final balance Honda CBF 1000 CBF 1000: Balance & Video Screw on, look at,…
-
Honda NC 700 S in the test: the entry-level motorcycle from Honda
Artist 12th pictures Honda 1/12 Honda NC 700 S – The naked bike is powered by an in-line two-cylinder engine of 670 cubic meters. Honda 2/12 Honda NC 700…
-
markus-jahn.com 28 pictures markus-jahn.com 1/28 Honda Crossrunner. markus-jahn.com 2/28 The basic construction of the Crossrunner comes from the time…